[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] another proxy, but not open source :-(
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] another proxy, but not open source :-(
- From: Curious Kid <letsshareinformation@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 25 May 2010 19:06:05 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1274828758; bh=zmCWkf4Znwi1dmi1E7WGuxKXZKiLBYs/gf0tgSMzC1k=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6w1w2Fu0ERds3mvjfcRCls4yDIV2RsAhxRX7AJA7OFmgFKSFfvQiIwbnpaojOhAJqhg13NEhRErpzJETcCMGtfxx2Say61quIj5A2HY08oI8UfM/COMFtDI4slOZ1noCIz/hoPmrjzFpZVyymEgChEOemGuIaxkeaHOVvOoccRc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WaGcsU8X6E30/66ANKyqnYOjp73eKw/UpkkAqUWxJ9dsu2oxPi4g59VmuWoH633fNI2YDxSM092iBNGChwSceEo2im+ezaJ1Pco1tTu1QpslFlkg+8kcoRQK3QufdVVvoIFuso0TGIne0YLTGLk7oO1Rte3KYCBL4j04bimAt60=;
- In-reply-to: <201005250859.o4P8xPoP021111@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <201005250859.o4P8xPoP021111@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole
> thing smacks of being a honeypot for gullible humans.
They have gotten awesome news coverage in over a dozen big-name media outlets. http://www.censorshipresearch.org/press/ I wonder why that is.
The whole project seems intensely focused on Iran. I wonder why that is, but it could explain the news coverage.
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/