Re: [tor-talk] What is being detected to alert upon?

[Tom van der Woerdt <info@xxxxxxx>]

The security added by Tor mimicking Firefox' TLS hello is questionable. 
It's a leftover concept from the initial versions of Tor, before 
pluggable transports became a thing.

Tor is pretty easy to fingerprint and as all relays are published in the 
consensus anyway fingerprinting isn't a big deal.

Bridges might have some very small benefit from looking like an old 
Firefox, but this is not proven. Also, pluggable transports completely 
eliminate the need for fingerprint resistance in Tor.

Tom




Allen schreef op 01/05/15 om 07:41:
> I didn't see an answer to this question, but I did compare the TLS Hello's
> from Firefox and the Tor binary distributed by torproject.org and there are
> lots of differences (see the two files attached), so I'm not sure this is
> worth worrying about...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allen [mailto:allenpmd@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:49 PM
> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [tor-talk] What is being detected to alert upon?
>
> > a connection to a Tor bridge looks kind of like regular TLS traffic.
>
> Question: I recompiled OpenSSL to remove a bunch of features that look
> unnecessary and might present a security risk, such as SSL2, SSL3 and DTLS.
> (In case it matters, it is OpenSSL v1.0.2a and the specific configure
> options are no-ssl2 no-ssl3 no-idea no-dtls no-psk no-srp no-dso no-npn
> no-hw no-engines -DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS -DOPENSSL_USE_IPV6=0).
>
> I'm using this rebuilt DLL with Tor.  Does this compromise Tor's TLS
> handshake so that it no longer looks like Firefox?  If so, what so I need to
> do to allow Tor to mimic Firefox's TLS handshake?

--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk