Re: tor privoxy squid

[Andrew Del Vecchio <firefox-gen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Just a note, Squid is very bad for privacy with tor. Please see the
related documentation on the wiki!

Thanks,
Andrew

- ---

Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. What's YOUR defense?
Protect your assets, keep what you earn, and generate more income at
the same time!
Visit http://www.mpassetprotection.com/



On 11/18/2006 08:04 AM, gabrix wrote:
> I have installed squid on the gateway machine together with
> privoxy-tor .Squid is configured to have privoxy-tor as parent
> proxy. Iptables is set to redirect port 80 traffic to squid's port
> 3128 .I have tor-privoxy on each lan machine and browsers'
> torbutton , too.when i start a browser connections from a lan
> machine browsers are configured with the local privoxy-tor and with
>  tcpdump on the gateway machine , http traffic doesn't seem to go
> to port 80 where iptables is supposed to redirect packets to squid
>  3128. If i click on a port 80 url , because tor , traffic goes to
>  tor network , let's say 9001 but it differs from time to time.How
>  can i catch with iptables tor traffic coming from my lan?By port
> we sayd too generic, i tryied by --uid-owner debian-tor but it
> doesn' seem to work,neither! Thank you !!! My lan machines are
> debian sarge stable kernel 2.6 , my gateway machine is a debian
> etch 2.6,too.
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFX262gwZR2XMkZmQRAyeWAKCcadhM6jRNXBSRI6Bl49I9JGWo2QCdGxuA
3A4TBQ9e661FuX/XgY1QmVs=
=WSet
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----