[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: court trial against me - the outcome

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: court trial against me - the outcome
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:46:03 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:46:17 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jg6ORrVIjHgEci5jG0DCOD7/hNCYwrnhDOC/QyZW0eU=; b=ODVRXTrOkVpq4DvorF6ELqQ6AP2Dw3qPMhwD0pFmI67mO5hztyGsr/0ihIkEYonH5taazKgSAkz3OBiJ65SpdiuFgNHIs3N9KnE1raW3ocy7w2jGm/31eMkvctFiXnVgumXO8e8OhVXJFbXGVb1BN8rWYIBfyK6Lr1AB0oOOMt8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I+LlMycZOYDpW0yV5iYIWdullFef1/qFzfyndjqoj7bodcin8pJZAWeuZjmMhBdOLjhqJndu2XuyJTBl8KYnhn4EUYaoM3wIpTYchgTS6A06VVolf4OW70ktg6lHknyMvvVejBHnb4SJJhRd+CkhyYJFq/skmDMYKc/2pdEgVzY=
In-reply-to: <474B5ADC.60601@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <DB7EDE68C477074B95AF60E3675AD4BB012440C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1196119570.11279.1223357187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <474B5ADC.60601@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
> Mark,
> 	In absentia was always there, it just wasn't SOP like it is now. BTW,
> are you familiar with jury nullification? It was a victim of the last
> round of substance prohibition in the 20s and 30s. Essentially, jurors
> have the (no longer honored) right to find a defendant 'not guilty' if
> they feel that the law he is accused of breaking is BS. See
> http://fija.org/ for more details.
> 
> ~Andrew
(much snippage)

It's a shame they don't have that right any more.

Laws have a purpose IMO, but they should go only as far as is absolutely
necessary.

- --
F. Fox
CompTIA A+, Net+, Security+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHS2jLbgkxCAzYBCMRAlSOAJ4/jZkKq90Vf1N/4wkVA5ouDMK6hQCePLhA
wiVmnptp8rO/kjp1IDdjPy4=
=ItIV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: court trial against me - the outcome
  - From: mark485anderson

References:
- court trial against me - the outcome
  - From: Mirko Thiesen
- Re: court trial against me - the outcome
  - From: mark485anderson
- Re: court trial against me - the outcome
  - From: Andrew Del Vecchio

Prev by Author: Re: Chroot TOR as explained on Wiki error
Next by Author: Re: court trial against me - the outcome
Previous by thread: Re: court trial against me - the outcome
Next by thread: Re: court trial against me - the outcome
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread