On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 19:49 +0000, adrelanos wrote: > grarpamp: > >> I'd like to see more discussion from more people here first, and see > >> whether somebody steps up to say, "Yeah, I can maintain that" here, or > >> whether somebody else who knows more than me about the issues has something > >> to say. Otherwise I don't know whether to write a "looking for maintainer" > >> post, a "who wants to fork" post, a "don't use Torsocks, use XYZZY" post, > >> or what. > > > > I've been using torsocks for years. Some comments: > > [...] > > - It is not necessary given TransPort and DNSPort. > > [...] > > I don't agree. torsocks is still useful to prevent identity correlation > through circuit sharing. Pushing all traffic through Trans- and DnsPort > is not the answer. Also, I don't want all of my applications using Tor -- just some of them. Using Tails or TransPort wouldn't allow me to do this. -- Sent from Ubuntu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk