Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements

[Mark McCarron <mark.mccarron@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It will not be a fork. Anything I do will be submitted for inclusion in the main branch when ready.

Quite a number of the changes I mentioned are in the pipeline anyway.
Mark McCarron


-------- Original Message --------
From: Red Sonja <BM-2cTpEdTADjx2bQf6WuuX1CPER78Sq3xL76@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue Nov 19 19:07:31 GMT+00:00 2013
To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements

Mark McCarron:
> It is my view TOR is currently compromised by intelligence agencies
> sharing information on TOR traffic.  These modifications must be made
> and rolled out ASAP.

So it's pointless to continue using Tor or any related tech. You ÂASAPÂ
mods are going to be broken even faster.

>> Have you read *IBM and the Holocaust*?
> 
> No, I will look it up.

I was hoping for Âreading instead of just look it up. But it's up to you.

> I'm examining this as a possibility but I am tied up until the august
> at least.  I have the necessary skills to deliver such a solution.
> It looks like most of what I am saying is being worked on in
> different ways and we just need to bring that together and roll it
> out.

I guess the whole list will welcome you with your fork. It would be
harder with getting the qualified eyes for peer review, tho.

Cheers!

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk



-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk