[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
From: Lars Boegild Thomsen <lth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:44:10 +0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:44:27 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=reclaim-your-privacy.com; s=2014; t=1414982654; bh=2qdRil/UUEJ5zharaFKN34156nXAsr+NrVo+tzFK4eU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dkF8d3Y7G52RWqwXeehkrRHDealz1EakpdxvosEF9bA+ublJwsUzUurlTt95xiVwQ bK50lMqW1gZjxtzAkZczv8f/SFUY/WeF4VVMf4IKqNXYA0BBMaHBnFrFW70/6xVJeV G9woQo+8kI1AzbAblNvpHFj7dR4ogmTZJEcSZarYcqc6gxHfDE792N6VTQnJ0LoxIN Ojg+RZokX6NL4tJ2YpmQWLfLI/MJP9c4CeHpfKLE8eOli/pOkl+uXQV2pmgymVonBU 5eXorDUSYcuItZNMQP1eZ5u/uANbKPWFxaOEJ73Faidl9C7WTGAEponk8/uVpTVEHI MWtV9JolwDN4g==
In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1QJ26Vtjt57N4Ducw3LV=MxnqaoGj0DY6L2D4-5vq8rxw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Reclaim Your Privacy
References: <7488606.2oxgLGVBPl@ncpws04> <CAJVRA1QJ26Vtjt57N4Ducw3LV=MxnqaoGj0DY6L2D4-5vq8rxw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-3-amd64; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; )

On Saturday 01 November 2014 12:42:41 coderman wrote:
> - support robust stream isolation, beyond what may be default. perhaps
> IsolateDestAddr and IsolateByClientAddr on TransPort (this does not
> yet exist, but you could code it to the benefit of all Transparent
> proxy consumer

Doesn't this already exist?  According to the Tor manual:

IsolateClientAddr
Donât share circuits with streams from a different client address. (On by default and strongly recommended; you can disable it with NoIsolateClientAddr.)

IsolateClientProtocol
Donât share circuits with streams using a different protocol. (SOCKS 4, SOCKS 5, TransPort connections, NATDPort connections, and DNSPort requests are all considered to be different protocols.)

IsolateDestPort
Donât share circuits with streams targetting a different destination port.

IsolateDestAddr
Donât share circuits with streams targetting a different destination address.

Ah - I just tested it - those two options are not recognized at all.

-- 
Lars Boegild Thomsen
https://reclaim-your-privacy.com
Jabber/XMPP: lth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
  - From: CJ
- Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
  - From: coderman

References:
- [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
  - From: Lars Boegild Thomsen
- Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
  - From: coderman

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread