[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
On 11/2/14, Lars Boegild Thomsen <lth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the case of a standard Cloak (as least as it is envisioned right now)
> that is not a problem for Cloak then. Cloak _will_ be the Wireless Access
> Point, it will enforce client isolation at Wi-Fi level and it will hand out
> separate address to each client.
> Hey - one challenge down :)
agreed. i mention this because the way i usually use transparent
proxy mode is as mentioned above: a local wifi router connected to
transparent Tor proxy connected to ISP.
in this situation, all the clients are behind the NAT WiFi router,
which complicated isolation.
if you _are_ the WiFi access point, as you intend to be, then there is
no NAT, and you avoid this issue. (perhaps note to end-user: best to
connect clients directly to Cloak, rather than a router to Cloak :)
thank you for your prompt responses and attention to these details!
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to