[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"
Onion sites sounds nice to me too. But we might have to change the
name to from tor2web to onion2web.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Seth David Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nathan Freitas writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>> > I'll start trying "onion service" and just see if it catches on.
>> Since these things are mostly used for websites, why not call them
>> "onion sites" or "onionsites"?
>> Typical users don't talk about web services, they talk about web sites
>> or pages. Perhaps they say "online service" but that usually means an
>> ISP or something larger than just a site, imo.
>> "Turn your website into an onionsite"
>> "Access the onionsite in the same way you access a website"
> It could be technically consistent to say both "hidden services" and
> "onion sites" -- you could say that onion sites are web sites that are
> served as hidden services.
> Seth Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx>
> Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/
> Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join
> 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 +1 415 436 9333 x107
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to