[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: We need more SILC-enabled relay servers!

To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: We need more SILC-enabled relay servers!
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:31:40 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:31:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <20041013141912.3a8f6adf.bpfr83@gmx.de>; from bpfr83@gmx.de on Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:19:12PM +0200
References: <20041013141912.3a8f6adf.bpfr83@gmx.de>
Reply-to: or-talk@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-or-talk@freehaven.net
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:19:12PM +0200, bkl wrote:
> as you can read at the subject, it would be nice if much more exitrouter-admins would allow
> dport 706 (SILC), so its possible again to connect to the SILC network!
> ((what ar u talking about guy, you ask? ----) http://www.silcnet.org))
> 
> SILC in conjunction with tor (and tsocks) its such a powerfull solution
>for secure&anonymous liveconferencing that it will kicks all censors
>asses very strong! :-)

If there are no objections, I could add an "accept *:706" line to the
default exit policy, so most servers would allow this.

Why didn't you guys pick a high-numbered port like normal projects? :)

--Roger

References:
- We need more SILC-enabled relay servers!
  - From: bkl <bpfr83@gmx.de>

Prev by Author: Re: (FWD) Tor, Socks bind, and BitTorrent
Next by Author: Re: (FWD) Tor, Socks bind, and BitTorrent
Previous by thread: We need more SILC-enabled relay servers!
Next by thread: Compiling my own version?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread