On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Oliver S. wrote: > Do you need TOR on your 100MBit-LAN??? Or do you have a 100MBit > internet-connection which is saturated noteworthy with TOR-traffic? I have a beige box at a colo which I'm using for a number of things, Tor included. Throttled, Tor is nonintrusive. This would not be possible, if Tor was written in Java (again, I used to run http://www.i2p.net/ and it was a resource hog). Unthrottled, a Tor written in Java would not be able to fully utilize the hardware. Both are sufficient reasons to kill the idea. > >I think it would be a terrible idea. > > But it's theroretically possible! Theoretically, I could stick a screwdriver into my eye. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature