[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re[3]: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re[3]: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
From: Marc Abel <m-abel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:37:37 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:37:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <268645070.20051011092718@gmail.com>
References: <7d9163f30510101355m77bd326qf80c12d7dc3da541@mail.gmail.com> <5c4c375e0510101423k5b9544d5udf6d98aa467ef231@mail.gmail.com> <5c4c375e0510101426p639da9vfb392c584f53e392@mail.gmail.com> <55163.210.50.4.123.1129010766.squirrel@webmail.addicts.nl> <268645070.20051011092718@gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

While I'm not interested in kazaa and azureus users, and I don't wish to
sponsor bandwidth for them on my exit node -- I am even less interested
in filtering content.  I'm either "with us" (convinced that private
communication is PRIVATE), or I'm "against us".

Marc

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 10:27, Arrakistor wrote:
> I  wonder  if  there  is a more agressive way to knock out p2p traffic
> without  much  overhead.  Such  as  if  kazaa  or azureus signed their
> packets.
> 
> ST

References:
- Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
  - From: Arrakis Tor
- Re: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
  - From: Matt Thorne
- Re: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
  - From: Matt Thorne
- Re: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
  - From: Martin Balvers
- Re[2]: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
  - From: Arrakistor

Prev by Author: Re: TOR in Java?
Next by Author: Interoperating with p2p traffic
Previous by thread: Re: Tor and bandwidth consumption... part 2
Next by thread: Interoperating with p2p traffic
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread