[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Broadband Reports: Tor Network Bogged Down by P2P




No, because as a midpoint node, you have no way of knowing where the data is coming from or going to - besides "the computer that just connected to you" and "the computer that you're about to connect to".


-Ben

Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, jed c wrote:

Well, tor allows you to block exit traffic. Is there also a way to block *transit* traffic?

-Dan


Guess I spoke to soon (without thinking).

--- Ben Wilhelm <zorba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


So, um, how exactly do you track how much bandwidth each user is using on a network whose sole goal is anonymization?


I was thinking about something on the user side. I
don't know how many users would edit the source code
to get around something like this.


And then let's associate that information with a server that's supposed to have an admin email contact available.


I understand that tor is about privacy and anonimity.


-Ben

jed c wrote:

The solution seems simple to me. Anyone using huge
amounts of bandwidth should be required to run a

tor

router.


Chris Palmer wrote:


----- Forwarded message from John Gilmore


<gnu@xxxxxxxx> -----

From: John Gilmore <gnu@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:40:18 -0700
Subject: [E-IP] Broadband Reports: Tor Network


Bogged Down by P2P

http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/68438

Some time ago our security regulars broke down

the


logistics behind

Tor, an anonymity tool from the Electronic

Frontier


Foundation. It was

designed for whistle-blowers, political

dissidents,


researchers, and

others concerned about exchanging information


without authoritarian

backlash. Sadly network performance is being


jeopardized by

file-traders looking to evade the RIAA.

File traders have been reconfiguring their Bit


Torrent clients to take

advantage of the network. Unfortunately the Tor


network wasn't

designed with high volume porn transfer in mind,

so


the activity is

slowing it down to a crawl. The likely result

will


be the EFF running

against the grain of their mandate, and

restricting


network use.

...

    John


----- End forwarded message -----




Bah, I see no problem with using it to evade the


RIAA.  sure, it sucks

for us Tor people who use it for what is was


intended for.  It just

means we need more nodes, and we need to grow more


to support this

demand. I'm all for giving the finger to "the

man."


It's time for Tor to expand, not regulate. And if


expansions isn't

possible, just let it suck! I can't imagine many


fileshare people will

cleave unto dial-up speeds with their broadband...



Once they learn that

it sucks to use Tor, they'll stop. We need


knee-jerk decisions in this

project like we need knee-jerk political

actions...


But, that's just my $0.02







__________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home

page!

http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs








__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com


--

"It's like GTA, except you pay for it, and you're allowed to use the car."

-Josh, on Zipcar on-demand car-rental, 3/20/05

--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie,  Sysadmin,  WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144   AIM: LarpGM
Site:  http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------