[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Access for the uncomputed
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Access for the uncomputed
- From: Patrick Coleman <blinken@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:08:43 +0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:09:00 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kuu87PgwY7fFc+GCYn4suS0J3/Vu5lbkA8TshML9ROBLxDVzrmypDYXBuXOhoUoX515rt6JJPrBTUvzRJqFP0GhLl23HDqWEhHrDgAbeZvI2jjxnaMv+GoTghZ9oZTQW/rp6fJJCkpoGR5xMJ/mSMUB3S11XbQtft+5hy5dxw/g=
- In-reply-to: <4f9bdc4c0510191552v2ef34ae4ic3c6d5938be2cc3c@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20050619132340.GA7906@itd.nrl.navy.mil> <20050621195409.GG29002@localhost.localdomain> <4f9bdc4c05062115262937d3d0@mail.gmail.com> <20050621224910.GI29002@localhost.localdomain> <603140b60506221901e45e0dc@mail.gmail.com> <603140b60506221904749b0ff4@mail.gmail.com> <4f9bdc4c0510191552v2ef34ae4ic3c6d5938be2cc3c@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CGIProxy is quite good in my experience; it seems to proxify URLs
better than CECID does. It performs exactly the same task as CECID,
though CECID has a few extra features (banned word filtering).
I did mention a while ago that I would modify CECID to work as a
frontend for tor, but its not looking like I'm going to get time to do
that anytime soon (though I live in eternal hope). The codes all in
CVS (http://cecid.sf.net), if anyone's interested in picking it up and
working on it drop me a line.
-Patrick
On 20/10/05, Joel Franusic <jfranusic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I just ran across: CGIProxy
> (http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy/cgiproxy-beta.html)
>
> A Proxy over CGI of sorts, similar to CECID (?). This looks like a
> perfect front end for Tor.
>
> It supports SSL and it looks like it can be easily configured to use a
> proxy (Tor).
>
> Has anybody tried this out?
>
> --Joel
>
> On 6/22/05, Patrick Coleman <blinken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Brilliant. I'll see if I cant get something going.
> > Thanks,
> > Patrick
> >
> > Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Patrick Coleman wrote:
> > >
> > >>shouldn't be too hard. I was actually considering interfacing it
> > with a proper anonymizer at some
> > >>point, like Tor, so I'd be happy to do that if thats what you want.
> > >
> > >
> > > That would be wonderful. We really do need something like this, that
> > > lets people point their browsers somewhere and be able to access .exit
> > > or .onion addresses.
> > >
> > > It should be even easier to find mirrors for you now too, because the
> > > mirrors don't need to be exiting the traffic themselves.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Roger
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > On 23/06/05, Patrick Coleman <blinken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > [I'll mail this to the list - I am subscribed, but at blinken@xxxxxxxxx]
> > >
> > > Hey,
> > > The client certainly hasn't had any work done on it for ages, so I was
> > > thinking of ditching that, certainly after I discovered tor. It was
> > > certainly a bit more complex than I bargained for :)
> > >
> > > With the script, it hasn't been developed in quite a while. I have
> > > been intending to do some work on it, though - I've got some working
> > > code that should fix a few problems, like SSL, forms and cookies.
> > > These fixes will also mean a rewrite of the HTTP fetching code, so
> > > working in HTTP proxying shouldn't be too hard. I was actually
> > > considering interfacing it with a proper anonymizer at some point,
> > > like Tor, so I'd be happy to do that if thats what you want.
> > >
> > > The script -shouldn't- be breaking stylesheets, so I'll have a look :)
> > > Thanks,
> > > Patrick
> > > +++
> > > Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
> > > Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4 BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
> > > http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt
> > >
> > > On 22/06/05, Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:26:33PM -0700, Joel Franusic wrote:
> > > > > Some quick searches on sf.net and freshmeat.net turn up:
> > > > > http://cecid.sourceforge.net/
> > > > >
> > > > > Links to servers running CECID:
> > > > > http://cecid.sourceforge.net/mirrors.php
> > > >
> > > > Oh hey, and Patrick Coleman runs a Tor server too:
> > > > http://serifos.eecs.harvard.edu:8000/cgi-bin/desc.pl?q=hal
> > > >
> > > > Patrick, how is this going? It looks like Tor can replace the more
> > > > ambitious part of your project, but step one is still a hard task to
> > > > get right too. :)
> > > >
> > > > It looks like it's GPL, which is good. But it looks like it breaks
> > > > stylesheets of the pages it downloads (e.g. tor.eff.org), which is
> > > > bad. What about SSL to the proxy page? Does it have a back-end that can
> > > > http-proxy to privoxy, and/or socks4a-proxy to Tor?
> > > >
> > > > Is this still in development, or should I take the "Copyright 2003"
> > > > to be a bad sign? :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --Roger
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
> > > Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4 BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
> > > http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
> > Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4 BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
> > http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt
> >
>
--
Public Key ID 0x4A6880B2
Key Fingerprint: 7867 E238 1608 1A20 89C4 BA6C 8FC3 C6EB 4A68 80B2
http://warhn.org/pcoleman/pubkey.txt