Thanks for clearing this up! :) Robert On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:09 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:38:18AM -0700, Robert W Capps II wrote:Interesting, while the server config page clearly says the email may not be answered, it does not indicate that the email will most likely never be ACTIONED. If it is the intention to not register names for servers, then that should be clearly stated in the Server configuration guide. It sounds like it's time to delete Step Four: 'Let us know about your server', since for all intents and purposes, the feature has been abandoned.I've removed step four, and also cleaned up some of the other items so they don't contain scary-sounding words like "stdout". Thanks for the nudge.
Am always good for a nudge now and then.
I for one would like to see some protection given to the names assigned to long-term stable routers . . .Me too. Keep your eyes out on the or-dev list for discussion about how to do this in a more manageable way.
I'll keep an eye on or-dev for the discussion.
but that may just be a personal preference of mine, I like to know which server ops take the time to actually register their servers :)Maybe we should instead assign them math problems to evaluate their dedication. :)
If that happens, I'll have to find and pay a 5th grader to help me out. ;)
Thanks, --Roger