[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: German data rentention law

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: German data rentention law
From: force44@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:56:36 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:56:50 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=N1-0105; d=Safe-mail.net; b=1uLdTvIng9EcbE2E0JXNZs687/IR7IE4I5eSRd3mvDzCtus7v0XISNF5R4nB3dR7 J6FtYjaRSiG3/NA4adZZoD4vGM2uj4PjDoKvyT8ySN6RgE9VcgxOHvwjyRb7LWXh gqKrBchzOjFOE9xGTfg44ml7jCiy5hHkLWD8PV5/fKA=;
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Tor developers: I demand to ban all german tor server per /1/1/2009
> from the tor network. Don' t trust the german regulators.

Great joke, as Germany isn't alone, all the EU is concerned. Also US has his Big Brother, Russia his SORM2, China his commies, etc etc

But there is one requirement that was suggested a lot of times and that sadly seems not to be implemented, it is to NOT allow more than one node in the same country, on a TOR circuit. This should be an option, activated by default.
That should considerably limit the risk of anonymity break.

Sad that (as far as I know), it isn't scheduled.

Prev by Author: Re: "Waiting for circuit"-problem (newbie)
Next by Author: Re: Strange problem with Tor/Scroogle
Previous by thread: Re: German data rentention law
Next by thread: Re: German data rentention law
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread