[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: any rough stats on bridges ?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: any rough stats on bridges ?
- From: Martin Fick <mogulguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:24:30 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255983866; bh=81DnUyXjdm1OlUFrtL5VkzVnEoz7YLlvVJx43Wy4QaE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Add7M9H29PIFnxzR5164e0rYQMB0IJy1rix+Pk7+vBRMmQoSS3fNGqRkWrZyrWCBG4gy7bmReE+AdD7we1L3Uekx0mkofKw5Dd3lLpZHjzVzMV8ZfbZ3L0nyYOhtVNIgW+Mru65KooSFieUdfQpbcL1fNrYmHOQ39nbxo2Da9Sc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vVbxkfEPKDEe3oBSNgq83rX+mNyMaB4Dt2AEaxywAN0GCxqokpHEgCU4fcvmjVEnbh7lhHw0W+nREVBcVQ2dR3RBbfqlBnZAMhi9IbsSZ7pRX9IJWXBo+CsaHxl71nXNd8aDc2W7RWuIOOzZ/77u/cP2SOJcXsLGSLWdY9Z1wl8=;
- In-reply-to: <c57501ff0910191305o59b4040y4c8e4b1eaf1f3b0a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think that unless you have a good way of telling specific people in the need of a bridge about your bridge without telling the world, that you should not consider being a bridge,
-Martin
--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Flamsmark <flamsmark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Flamsmark <flamsmark@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: any rough stats on bridges ?
> To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 4:05 PM
> I'd like
> to see some stats, or even some conjecture, as to the
> longevity of a bridge, and what it means for the bridge to
> be born, be used, and eventually be blocked.
>
>
>
> I understand the mechanisms used to slowly feed bridge
> information to people who request them, but even that
> slowness can't keep them from eventually being
> discovered and blocked.
>
>
> It seems that a reasonable question might
> be: for a home user, with a static IP, planning to
> contribute to Tor, which is most useful: should they just be
> a bridge; start out as a bridge, and then eventually change
> to a relay; or immediately sign on as a relay? Given some
> responses to this, might it make sense to construct a tool
> to tell people when their bridges should change to
> relays?
>
>
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/