[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: TorFaq on https for hidden services ( was: Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers )

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TorFaq on https for hidden services ( was: Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers )
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:01:20 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:01:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <20101028101052.2e817306@worthil>
References: <20101028101052.2e817306@worthil>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:10:52AM +0100, startx wrote:
> the answer in the FAQ refers to privoxy. so i wonder now: is this
> answer obsolete meanwhile?

Yes, it's wrong. It's a wiki -- please fix it. :)

In fact, none of the Tor developers added this particular question in
the first place. That's part of why I've been pushing to migrate the faq
entries that are actually useful onto https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq
so we can abandon the wiki faq.

Thanks,
--Roger

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- TorFaq on https for hidden services ( was: Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers )
  - From: startx

Prev by Author: Re: Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers - their comments on Tor and SSL - I don't understand.
Next by Author: Re: gratuitous change blocks upgrade to 0.2.2.15-alpha :-(
Previous by thread: Re: TorFaq on https for hidden services ( was: Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers )
Next by thread: Descriptor fingerprint format
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread