(Why the cross-post to tor-relays?) grarpamp: > Keep in mind that while it may be frustrating to some users config > tests to find that they are temporarily using a false negative exit... > this 'multihoming' could, and should in fact, be considered a feature > since it keeps some exits out of the reach of anti-tor blocklists > that simply parse all the IP's out of the descriptor set. I have to disagree here. While administrators who block Tor indiscriminately cause pain to every Tor users, we should solve the problem with education, not deception. On the technical side, TorDNSEL should properly detect the IP address used by exit nodes, so check.tpo should not report false negatives for multihomed exits. Otherwise, either the node did not had time to be tested, or there's a bug in TorDNSEL. Being able to add an extra CAPTCHA for Tor clients or other proxy services is a legitimate wish in face of abuses. Providing ways to do so that work reliably is more likely to help with indiscriminate bans. -- Lunar <lunar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk