[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wikipedia & Tor

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
From: "Bryan L. Fordham" <bfordham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:04:33 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:04:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <20050927163710.GA17041@eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <7d9163f30509270548492f6a03@mail.gmail.com> <20050927125802.GR2249@leitl.org> <20050927130857.GA17250@homeport.org> <20050927131615.GD28079@socialistsushi.com> <20050927160038.GA19760@homeport.org> <20050927160926.GL28079@socialistsushi.com> <20050927163710.GA17041@eecs.harvard.edu>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:37:10PM -0400, Geoffrey Goodell wrote:
> It seems that applying this argument to Tor is precarious, since the
> emerging technological fortresses have surely raised the bar for
> anonymous speech well beyond the reach of otherwise law-abiding citizens
> who happen to be in the possession of some inscrutable tactics.

I don't think "precarious" is the same as "invalid"

--B

References:
- Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Arrakis Tor
- Re: Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Adam Shostack
- Re: Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Bryan L. Fordham
- Re: Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Adam Shostack
- Re: Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Bryan L. Fordham
- Re: Wikipedia & Tor
  - From: Geoffrey Goodell

Prev by Author: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
Next by Author: Re: Tor and port 80
Previous by thread: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
Next by thread: TorPark v0.1
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread