[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:32:26 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:32:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <20060910201400.48976.qmail@web37806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Anothony Georgeo's message of "Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:14:00 -0700 (PDT)")
References: <45046990.4080301@ml1.net> <20060910201400.48976.qmail@web37806.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

> Well, I know Roger, Nick, etc are against it but making Tor run as a
> server by default may be worth more consideration (I2P does this).

What about people behind NAT/firewalls that they don't control?

What about people with battery-powered devices?

                                        Juliusz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.
  - From: Jonathan D. Proulx

References:
- Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.
  - From: glymr
- Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.
  - From: Anothony Georgeo

Prev by Author: Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds
Next by Author: Re: (unknown)
Previous by thread: Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.
Next by thread: Re: Tor Defense Fund...an idea.
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread