Re: How anonymity software landscape will look

[glymr <glymr_darkmoon@xxxxxxx>]

unless i'm mistaken, for the average adsl/cable user, this means some
meaningless number like 10.0.0.2 or 192.168.0.4

Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Very true. Add to this the use of secure apps. This means no Skype,
> which codes your local IP into headers, etc.
> 
> ~Andrew
> 
> Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. It's a scary world
> out there!
> Protect your privacy, keep what you earn, and even earn more income at:
> http://www.mpassetprotection.com/
> 
> 
> 
> Watson Ladd wrote:
>> For content retrieval: Freenet/Gnunet.
>> For anonymous services: I2P(possibly)
>> For anonymous Internet: Tor
>> For anonymous email: Onion Routers
>>
>> Each piece of software fills a niche in this hierarchy. Tor is the most
>> important as it lets people use existing applications anonymously. Sure,
>> Tor will have .onion forever, and I2P will have gateways to the
>> Internet, but they are optimized for different things. That's why we
>> can't just use one solution. Each one fills or will a different need.
>>
>> -Watson Ladd
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFFEKXhgwZR2XMkZmQRAokcAKCFXQ6fCo5WujWQ/M4sJVvbrlaEKgCgx0/8
> 20ia/0tLmrSS3BugYlvEZYM=
> =HsdQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>