[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

More important: Bridges or ORs

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: More important: Bridges or ORs
From: Andrew Del Vecchio <firefox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:47:45 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:56:28 -0400
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

I'm currently running my tor node as a bridge, and have been for a
couple of months now. Haven't seen much traffic, which I guess makes
sense. Which does the community think is more important right now,
running as a bridge or as a OR? I'm located geographically in the
Northeastern portion of the USA, if that makes any kind of difference.

Gracias,
Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More important: Bridges or ORs
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: Gmail
Next by Author: Announcing the tor-relays mailing list
Previous by thread: Re: Tor a carrier for Botnet traffic?
Next by thread: Re: More important: Bridges or ORs
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread