[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: More important: Bridges or ORs

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: More important: Bridges or ORs
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:58:50 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:58:53 -0400
In-reply-to: <4A9DDCD1.2010703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A9DDCD1.2010703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:47:45PM -0400, Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
> I'm currently running my tor node as a bridge, and have been for a
> couple of months now. Haven't seen much traffic, which I guess makes
> sense. Which does the community think is more important right now,
> running as a bridge or as a OR? I'm located geographically in the
> Northeastern portion of the USA, if that makes any kind of difference.

Fortunately, I wrote this up as a faq entry during the June Iran
events. :)

https://www.torproject.org/faq#RelayOrBridge

--Roger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More important: Bridges or ORs
  - From: Arjan

References:
- More important: Bridges or ORs
  - From: Andrew Del Vecchio

Prev by Author: More Secure Tor Browsing Through A Virtual Machine in Ubuntu (Version .2)
Next by Author: Tor 0.2.2.1-alpha is out
Previous by thread: More important: Bridges or ORs
Next by thread: Re: More important: Bridges or ORs
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread