On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 07:45:57 +0200 Sebastian Pfeifer <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It somehow could be true what you say as I run tor on a machine with > really really really small RAM (128MB) as I don't 'shit' money as a > pupil to afford a bigger server. I wonder how much are you paying for it. For example [1] provides 512 MB of RAM for $5/month. Is that really too expensive? But even there, Tor regularly starts to use 200+ MB of swap, in effect it tries to use ~700+ MB of RAM. So I would say trying to run a relay on just 120+106 MB as you are trying to do is not feasible currently. (Although I run a 64 bit system there in hope that crypto would be faster on 64 bit; possibly the RAM usage would be lower on 32 bit). [1] https://www.digitalocean.com/ > I use Munin to monitor the server and it says that tor last used 80MB of > the RAM and then the graph stops at around 3PM so it might have been a > system or host related issue that tor stopped working this time. > top - 07:37:58 up 12:07, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > Tasks: 67 total, 1 running, 66 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 8.2%us, 1.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 88.4%id, 0.3%wa, 1.2%hi, 0.8%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 124880k total, 118764k used, 6116k free, 24k buffers > Swap: 109560k total, 54988k used, 54572k free, 13460k cached -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk