Re: Overview Doc.

[Christian Reiniger <warewolf@mayn.de>]

Adrian Ratnapala wrote:

[iostream interface]
>> This won't be much bloat. The iostream interface most likely will be a
>> variant of the usual iostream (well, fstream) interface that refers to the
>> stdio functions.
>
>I suppose it's OK if you can do it without bloat.  BTW the standard
>C++iostream does not have to refer to iostream.  In fact under GNU they

you mean stdio?

>do it the other way around!  (Well, not exactly, but something like that.
>I don't know how.)

Well, perhaps I'll do it similar. Representing the directory structure of
an archive file can be done much nicer in C++ than in C. We'll see.

Cu	
	Christian
--

REALITY.SYS corrupted ... reboot Universe [Y,n]?