[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New directions with much less objectives (Was Re: Comments?)
Adrian Ratnapala wrote:
>> >I thought of switching to auto_ptr<>, since that kind of thing
>> >is more to my taste, but I balked because I am not sure if the
>> >auto_ptr<> on GNU systems is standard, so for now I am doing
>> Last time I checked (egcs 1.0.3) it wasn't :-((
>Can we rely on the behaviour documented is Soustroup?
>(Or however you spell it).
auto_ptr <> is completely missing from libstdc++. IIRC they left it out
because the behavior changed too much in the C++ draftes, and now it's
scheduled for libstdc++ 3 :(
if (1==1.003) printf ("Pentium detected!\n");