[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8

To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
From: Luca <lucafbb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:39:08 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:39:13 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Pcmp3f3zpAWf+GOTfPynpaanNsCvjjWuv5qjbDualPo=; b=sBUpz6vZuB3VEL71/Ak2BPJOrmSyEQNGk+jFHsFqGiJRssZdEr/At3Z6ezewfBIGii ITMY5a8D9n0FMF9X7OYA82cLcx+xUovVVYGRUdeHn4vnkOPy4Ae2I+UgVFw/KFlyWUuO hIxpGXF7CMhm9wATxOqVk4cXTfjGDABqbz5sI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ajjeEZKo0NBkI7SJXBB/QBQlzkhdDdtygJ14PCVdEwUbC2pBebdSwJDAwgCrB4B5A0 HqWSyOzOJdineAyk4bc+f/Ij5au61EY+tBk/VWn7gm43oZ+HPfB16aMMKB+vdCO5XWHo iWPiKDL/eH27+ZSsev6oP/Pl1/Klm6sXYK8uI=
In-reply-to: <64ddb72c0812141536s2d8a286fp791da09e5b535e00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <27308d500812140349h3374eaa9wf756dd450006db9e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <27308d500812140604g3b9ddf09yc15096c4aa767962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <64ddb72c0812141536s2d8a286fp791da09e5b535e00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:36 AM, René Dudfield <renesd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi,
>
> There were some bugs with 1.7.x with some surface arguments.

Thanks for replying, but I found more natural the old 1.7 behaviour...
Now seems that the set_alpha is ignored... It's strange.


-- 
-- luca

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
  - From: James Paige

References:
- [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
  - From: Luca
- Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
  - From: Luca
- Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
  - From: René Dudfield

Prev by Author: Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
Next by Author: [pygame] groups drawing optimization
Previous by thread: Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
Next by thread: Re: [pygame] Problem: difference in surface alpha from pygame 1.7 and 1.8
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread