Re: [pygame] The gsoc physics module, bug fixing?

[帆 张 <zhangfanfox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Peter,

 

Thanks for your careful attention to my works :-)

I use OpenGL just for testing physics algorithms in C because this's no need for python wrapper, I can focus more on finishing algorithms first. Of course, finally, this testing method will be abandoned, which means glut is no need to link.

Currently I start with some works about python wrapping, and I finished some codes and extended some basic functions for python wrapping. The python test file "test1.py" is being under test, and there are some bugs in python wrapping.  I plan to publish my work to the community when these basic works have been done.

 

Best wishes

Zhang Fan

 

Peter Gebauer <peter.gebauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道：

> Hi
>  guys!
>
> I noticed a lot has happened, but very little communication here, is
> everything going alright? :)
> There's a new test1.py suggesting there would be Python side testing
> available, but I keep getting
>
> ImportError: ./build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.5/physics.so: undefined symbol: 
> glutBitmap9By15
>
> when trying to import the physics module.
>
> Is it necessary to link glut (or whatever is needed) to test? Or should I 
> just hold my horses and settle down for a while longer?
>
> /Peter
>
>
> On 2008-06-29 (Sun) 15:30, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > On, Sun Jun 29, 2008, Peter Gebauer wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Zhang and others!
> > 
> > [Python wrapper issues]
> > 
> > The wrapper implementation is not really started yet, so it's a bit
> > early. In order to keep argument parsing flexible, I'd recommend using
> > METH_VARARGS and PyArg_ParseTuple() instead of the _0, ... macros. This
> > let's one easily
>  enhance anything without the need to change too much
> > code. Additionally you can let the parser handle argument checking
> > without the need to deal with ex- or implicit object conversions.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Marcus

---

 雅虎邮箱，您的终生邮箱！