Lindstrom<
len-l@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
len-l@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
René Dudfield wrote:
Hi,
one issue with the new Color type is unpacking to
r,g,b or r,g,b,a.
In some places Color is assumed to return (r,g,b) and
others
(r,g,b,a), and now many things return a Color rather
than a tuple.
So I want to change Color to unpack to r,g,b,a or r,g,b.
r,g,b = pygame.Color(1,2,3,4)
r,g,b,a = pygame.Color(1,2,3,4)
Anyone have an idea how this can work? Either in C or
python?
This is to keep backwards compatibility.
cheers,
Hi René,
Are there cases where this is breaking code? For the most
part I believe
Pygame functions returned 4-tuples. So Color is just
pretty much a drop-in
replacement. If a program is using tuples to declare color
values then the
size is already known and unpacking is not a problem. It is
Surface.get_palette and get_palette_at, which originally
returned 3-tuples,
where we run into problems. So here are the choices I see.
One, just accept
that the new get_palette and get_palette_at will break
things, just as any
program that tries to use a color return value as a
dictionary key will now
break. How many programs actually use color palettes
anyway? Two, give Color
a size property. If alpha is set None it becomes length 3.
But then how does
one represent this internally without adding another field
to the Color C
structure? Declare the color component values as C ints?
Three, create a new
Color subtype of length 3 having a fixed alpha of 255. I'm
not happy with
any of the choices but prefer three. Any other ideas?
Lenard
hi,
yeah for example in solarwolf:
File "solarwolf-1.5/code/gamemenu.py", line 70, in
load_game_resources
pal = [(g,g,b) for (r,g,b) in origpal]
File "solarwolf-1.5/code/objshot.py", line 28, in
load_game_resources
for (r,g,b) in origpal]
hrmm. I think a 3 element Color subtype might be the way to go.
Maybe we don't even need a subtype, but just a length property
that
can be 1,2,3, or 4? As you say get_palette(_at) could return
len 3
Colors.
If it could unpack to 3, or 4 depending on the number of
elements on
the left, I think I'd prefer that though.
Hi,
Well yes, but now you are have something that is basically an
integer array, including the additional overhead.