[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?

To: pygame-users@seul.org
Subject: [pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?
From: "campbell barton" <ideasman@linuxmail.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 12:44:00 +0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: pygame-users@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 23:44:03 -0500
Reply-to: pygame-users@seul.org
Sender: owner-pygame-users@seul.org

I need fast 2D alpha images, opengl supports a kind of blitting.
glDrawPixels( textureSurface.get_width(), textureSurface.get_height(), GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, textureData)

Works but I cant get alphas, does anyone know weather DrawPixels is slower or faster then textures on quads?

PS, I also found that textures on quads need to be 128x128, 256x256, 512x512 etc- I bit of a limitation.
-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
____________________________________
pygame mailing list
pygame-users@seul.org
http://pygame.seul.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?
  - From: Jasper Phillips <jasper@peak.org>
- Re: [pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?
  - From: "Andy Sy" <andy@netfxph.com>
- spritegl was ([pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?)
  - From: Rene Dudfield <illumen@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [pygame] PROPOSAL: Faster Collision Checking: Ordering Sprites to Boost spritecollide Speed (Please Comment!)
Next by Date: Re: [pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?
Previous by thread: [pygame] osx supported!
Next by thread: Re: [pygame] Pyopengl blitting vs quads?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread