[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pygame] Pyggy Awards are Go, Almost
- To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [pygame] Pyggy Awards are Go, Almost
- From: "Charlie Nolan" <funnyman3595@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:02:09 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:02:12 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=nGtBVVAd2uhIACKvMSLQOPvrqypXw0Ltcw/VcVlFv2Y=; b=nqkIG3oVyd+dLwAgLYtDH89N2aPel9Yp4Pqlh2HNI/h3A/+AA6kLeeJa8mybHFZieL A6L6te9Bmlzkm43e/IeTCDvox37tJbfAC7cn1TKg3o/RGOQ9cuxpCutlsiaPpZicgjU7 hqudlH4RB+6MdEJeCAKyNkNzvXKRQ7F5OZ/B0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Ff5G8P9Vl+wtVtewVHfxsDxrFKt3Ws9FSoy98CiasYb315asKNyll+6nYvIjt1doEq Z8XlQs2Ktn3jUPMnt8i4gJLtaXkxEWwouwh45SopxVhTVfsTomk5A6eo9GBWe4J3DlRS mzyaix6frbcfo2TbtbWThGKtwT1t6neCURwaw=
- In-reply-to: <48FFD34A.1010800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20081023002313.GA10501@platonas> <48FFD34A.1010800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Greg, the rules on the site
(http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/python/pyggy/) seem to
forbid games older than the previous PyWeek. Are there any plans for
a special edition or some such that would allow older PyWeek games?
-FM
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Richard and I have been working on setting up a web site
> for the Pyggy Awards, and it's very nearly ready to go!
>
> In case you've forgotten, the Pyggy Awards is going to be
> a showcase event for games based on a previous PyWeek entry.
> If you want to polish one of your PyWeek games and have
> somewhere to show off the result, this is it.
>
> The Pyggy Awards will be run in a very similar way to
> the PyWeek competition, with the following differences:
>
> * You can start working immediately, or even in the past,
> i.e. any further work you've already done on an existing
> PyWeek entry is eligible.
>
> * Any library code can be used, as long as it's open
> source.
>
> The only thing remaining to be decided is the dates for
> the judging period. The possibilities are:
>
> a) Early December, probably the first 2 weeks.
>
> b) Some time in February or March next year.
>
> Option (b) obviously allows more coding time, but the
> next PyWeek is going to be in early April, so it wouldn't
> leave much time for people to recover their energy.
>
> So I'm asking for feedback on this -- what would you
> prefer? More time, or more breathing space before the
> next PyWeek?
>
> --
> Greg
>