|
I current publish software under Open Software
License version 1.1
Jim
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 9:48
AM
Subject: [school-discuss] What License
for automatic schedule building?
> It should be developed
as a stand alone engine that can be utilized by
> developers of both
open source administrative systems and commercial
> systems. I am
willing to work with anyone who shares this vision. I would
> not
approve (although there is nothing I can do about it) of anyone taking
> this start and adding good ideas in secret to it. If you have a
good idea
> please share it with the rest of us.
Important issues fall into the realm of
"license discussions." Community projects, IMHO, need to cross the License
hurdle early, if not first.
Some license choices would NOT permit the
engine to be utilized by both open-souce and closed-source developers. But,
you wrote, "commercial systems." Most licenses do allow for open source and
commercialization. Libre Software with charges.
You are willing to
work with anyone who shares this vision -- but I fear that the vision of yours
isn't yet really shared.
What specific license do you suggest?
Apache?
LGPL?
Ta.
Mark
Rauterkus
mark@Rauterkus.com http://Rauterkus.com
http://CLOH.Org
http://Sunnyhill.org http://www.Deliberate.com
|