[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [school-discuss] About Top/Bottom posting

To: schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [school-discuss] About Top/Bottom posting
From: hans paijmans <paai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:49:52 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: schoolforge-discuss-outgoing@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:49:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <200601180939.14738@complexity.summit.net>
Reply-to: schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050727

Bill Barowy wrote:
> Just a couple of counter-points to the tradition of bottom posting that is 
> sometimes evoked when someone top posts. 
I feel very much that this topic does not add in any way to the
appropriate topics on
this list...



-- 
Dr. J.J. Paijmans
thuis: Elzenstraat 1, Waalre, 040-2230680    http://paijmans.net
Tilburg University, Faculty of Arts,        Dept. of Linguistics & AI
Tilburg, Netherlands (+31) (0)13-4662693    http://pi0959.kub.nl
+31 621 961 083

Follow-Ups:
- [school-discuss] Meta-communication: About Top/Bottom posting
  - From: Bill Barowy

References:
- [school-discuss] About Top/Bottom posting
  - From: Bill Barowy

Prev by Author: Re: [school-discuss] Linux and Active Directory/Windows networking
Next by Author: Re: [school-discuss] We did it!
Previous by thread: [school-discuss] About Top/Bottom posting
Next by thread: [school-discuss] Meta-communication: About Top/Bottom posting
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread