[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SEUL: SEUL duplicating efforts?
Orn E. Hansen wrote:
> řann 15-Feb-98 skrifar Kevin Forge:
> > I was trying to make this point. Any Fail-safe can fail. And because
> > of there complexity it's near impossible to make an unbreakable GUI
> > How are you going to prevent a user from telling his computer that
> > his old ( pree PnP ) NEC 14" monitor is actually a 21" Monitor of the
> > same vintage ? There must be a way out that works weather or not the
> > GUI thinks it's broken. This escape must leave him in a position to
> > easily configure his system.
> That I agree with 100%
> My point is, however, that a character based menu setup should be a
> fallback option. For those who just don't want GUI setup, and if the GUI
> setup is too screwed up for the user.
> It's true that many Unix/Linux guys just don't want GUI, and that's just
> why GUI isn't the de-facto standard for Unices. But at the same time, we
> must acknowledge that most users *want* GUI. To them, a GUI is like a
> brand new stereo... sure, their old stereo does the same. But the brand
> new one, is _hot_ stuff... get my point? And in most lower grad colleges
> and high schools, the only thing people learn about programming, is to
> put a button on a canvas and code for it to say "print x+y,'hi mom'". For
> these GUI is the computer... without it, it's like a typewriter.
> You and I know it isn't like that... I use GUI, but I like the Unix layout
> because it gives me the power over the system. I use Linux, because it
> gives me development power, which you don't have on other systems... and, I can
> even get GUI, where I want that.
I being a relative Linux newly understand you exactly. I use the GUI
most times ... and drop to text mode for specific tasks ( reading text
files, compiling progs etc.. )
: "Through the firewall, out the router, down the T1, across the
: backbone, bounced from satellite, Nothing but net."