Re: [seul-edu] Best wm for tiny slow computers?

[Dave Prentice <dprentice@uno.edu>]

You can squeeze a basic RH 6.2 with gnome into about 400-450 meg; from what
I've seen and heard, 7.x takes at least a couple hundred meg more. Don't
know why.
Dave Prentice
prentice@instruction.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
To: seul-edu@seul.org <seul-edu@seul.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: [seul-edu] Best wm for tiny slow computers?


>On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Ralph M. Deal wrote:
>
>> will run in RH 6.2 which I've chosen for its size.
>
>Does a recent version of Red Hat Linux really take up more space or
>resources?
>
>It seems like if you install the same packages, then it will be similar in
>size (with better performance and security with the more recent release).
>
>   Jeremy C. Reed
>   http://www.reedmedia.net/
>
>