Re: [seul-edu] Move to schoolforge-discuss

[William Abernathy <william@inch.com>]

I want to weigh in in favor of schoolforge-discuss as well. Its focus and
mission are clearly distinct from those of SEUL/Edu. Issues relevant to
Schoolforge as a coalition are not the same as those of one of its
members. SEUL/Edu is a Schoolforge constituent. Conducting Schoolforge
business on SEUL's list gives the false impression that the 'forge is a
SEUL project. The move will bring needed focus to both entities.

--William

On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Matt Jezorek wrote:

> >
> >
> >
> >>- What's the point of "renaming" the mailing list ?
> >>- seul-edu is broader in scope than schoolforge.
> >>- It can be done seamlessly by  letting the people to subscribe themselves to
> >>another hypothetical list.
> >>- There're another ways for distinguishing schoolforge flow, for example,
> >>"Subject:[Schoolforge]"
> >>- Splitting a list into two divides the interest and vitality by four.
> >>
> Here is where I have to disagree, SEUL/edu is a member of
> Schoolforge.net not Schoolforge. there for if all schoolforge discussion
> went on SEUL/edu mailing lists then that would mean SEUL/edu =
> Schoolforge, this is not the case and I really agree with the split.
>
> >>
>