Fw: [Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?]

[Douglas Loss <dloss@suscom.net>]

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, owner-seul-edu@seul.org wrote:

> From: Alvaro del Castillo <acs@ulises.openresources.com>
> To: seul-edu@seul.org
> Subject: Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?

> Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> > 
> > On Sunday 26 November 2000 19:11, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > > After reading the message on KDE-EDU, it has sparked a
> question for me
> > > to ask: KDE or GNOME? I like GNOME because of its Open
> Source nature
> > > but the students don't really care about OSS. So would
> GNOME or KDE be
> > > a better choice?
> > 
> > KDE has more Open Source nature than GNOME. The
> KDE-core-developers are
> > more friendly than the GNOME-core-developers.
> 
> Ops, I don't think taht this is true. I am a GNOME developer
> and I know
> several GNOME core developrs and they are nice people. I also
> know
> KDE developers and yes, they are friendly also.
> 
> > Some students care about OSS (at least I do).
> > KDE 2.0 is technically better than GNOME 1.x and there is
> 
> Ops, another afirmation without a technical base. The GNOME
> arquitecture
> uses CORBA and a componente arquitecture called Bonobo very
> powerful.
> I don't think that KDE is technically better.
> 
> > http://www.andamooka.org/reader.pl?section=kde20devel which
> helps a lot
> > to start a KDE 2.0 programm.
> > KDE 2.0 uses Konqueror which is the most efficient tool I
> ever used.
> > http://www.konqueror.org
> 
> In GNOME you have Nautilus, also, very impressive.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- Alvaro
> 
> > 
> > Max Moritz Sievers
> 
> -- 
> ===================================================
> Alvaro del Castillo San Félix	acs@barrapunto.com
> Barrapunto.com
> 
-- 
Doug Loss           The art of medicine consists of amusing the
dloss@suscom.net    patient while nature cures the disease.
(570) 326-3987             Voltaire