[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SEUL: Common SEUL/e-linux tools needed

To: William T Wilson <fluffy@benatar.dunadan.com>
Subject: Re: SEUL: Common SEUL/e-linux tools needed
From: Paul Anderson <paul@geeky1.ebtech.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 18:52:34 -0500 (EST)
cc: Loren S Osborn <lso8219@cs.rit.edu>, kde-distribution@thunder.dorm.duke.edu, seul-project@seul.org, omega@seul.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980108032759.17146I-100000@benatar.dunadan.com>
Sender: owner-seul-project@seul.org
To-Get-Off-This-List: mail majordomo@seul.org, body unsubscribe seul-project

On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, William T Wilson wrote:

> 
> This is why we need to decide, once and for all, whether we're going to
> put up with RedHat's packages or just with their package format.  I just
> don't believe in mixing and matching and hoping it works.  It's an
> organizational nightmare, and I firmly believe that everything we
> distribute should come from us.  This alleviates all manner of problems.
> 
And it creates a pile of new ones.  If we make something at all
incompatable with RPM, we're asking for trouble.  I don't think we have
the time to completely rewrite all of sunsite's archive...  TTYL!


                            ---
                        Paul Anderson
		   paul @ geeky1.ebtech.net
    Author of Star Spek(a tongue in cheek pun on Star trek)
e-mail: starspek-request@lowdown.com with subscribe as the subject
I hear it's hilarious.               Maintainer of the Tips-HOWTO.
          http://www.netcom.com/~tonyh3/speck.html
	     Line noise provided by Bell Telephone!

References:
- Re: SEUL: Common SEUL/e-linux tools needed
  - From: William T Wilson <fluffy@benatar.dunadan.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SEUL: Migration, and a brief recap
Next by Date: SEUL: Re: package format
Prev by thread: Re: SEUL: Common SEUL/e-linux tools needed
Next by thread: Re: SEUL: Common SEUL/e-linux tools needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread