[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SEUL: Re: SEUL packaging, etc.

To: Erik Walthinsen <omega@omegacs.net>
Subject: SEUL: Re: SEUL packaging, etc.
From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 22:44:56 -0800 (PST)
cc: Nathan E Norman <finn@midco.net>, William T Wilson <fluffy@benatar.dunadan.com>, Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>, seul-project@seul.org
In-Reply-To: <199801150637.WAA27316@router.omegacs.net>
Sender: owner-seul-project@seul.org
To-Get-Off-This-List: mail majordomo@seul.org, body unsubscribe seul-project

On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Erik Walthinsen wrote:

> > No comment :)
> The use of sendmail may also be up for debate.  At the time sendmail was 
> "decided upon", we had intentionally restricted our choices to sendmail and 
> qmail.  The debate was over two things: capabilities and license.  sendmail 
> came out on top in both of those categories.

http://www.exim.org   ... you will be glad you did!  Ok, I am off this
topic on Debian's list and going to lurk on your project list for a while.

> 

George Bonser 
If NT is the answer, you didn't understand the question. (NOTE: Stolen sig)
http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.

References:
- SEUL: SEUL packaging, etc.
  - From: Erik Walthinsen <omega@omegacs.net>

Prev by Date: SEUL: SEUL packaging, etc.
Next by Date: SEUL: PLZ: Watch what you say
Prev by thread: SEUL: SEUL packaging, etc.
Next by thread: SEUL: PLZ: Watch what you say
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread