[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #25814 [Core Tor/Tor]: Should Travis use "make distcheck"?
#25814: Should Travis use "make distcheck"?
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner: nickm
Type: defect | Status: merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.4.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-ci, 034-roadmap-subtask | Actual Points:
Parent ID: #25550 | Points:
Reviewer: isis | Sponsor:
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by isis):
* status: needs_review => merge_ready
* reviewer: => isis
Comment:
I'm sorry, I noticed the Rust breakage with 0.3.1 and 0.3.2 because I
build .debs for my Qubes sys-tor VM, but I never said anything because I
don't (want to) understand enough!^Wmore about Debian or its packaging
system(s) and didn't really want to get into it. In retrospect, I probably
should have filed a ticket.
This patch LGTM!
Maybe we want to have conversations at some point about what Jenkins'
function/purpose is (I thought it existed specifically to test packaging
and more diverse architectures and platforms like arm and win32), and who
maintains our Debian stuff (we seem to do a lot of bending over backwards
specifically for Debian when there's also other good distros whom we
completely ignore)? If so, maybe we should schedule these conversations
for the Seattle 2018 network-team meeting?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25814#comment:5>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs