[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #18037 [Tor]: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS VIRTPORTs?

#18037: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS VIRTPORTs?
------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  yawning     |          Owner:
     Type:  defect      |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Low         |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.8.x-final
Component:  Tor         |        Version:  Tor: unspecified
 Severity:  Minor       |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-hs dns  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:              |         Points:
  Sponsor:              |
------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by atagar):

 > That said, documentation clarification that an FQDN is acceptable would
 be ideal.

 Thanks. If we update the docs then [https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-
 manual.html.en#HiddenServicePort HiddenServicePort] is the spot. Is there
 a compelling use case for FQDN hidden service targets? If it's useful then
 by all means keep it as-is, but if not I'd shy toward simplicity by just
 accepting IPv4/6 addresses. We can always add FQDN support in the future
 if use cases crop up.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18037#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs