[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #18037 [Tor]: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS TARGETs? (was: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS VIRTPORTs?)

#18037: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS TARGETs?
------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  yawning     |          Owner:
     Type:  defect      |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Low         |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.8.x-final
Component:  Tor         |        Version:  Tor: unspecified
 Severity:  Minor       |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-hs dns  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:              |         Points:
  Sponsor:              |
------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by yawning):

 I'm not sure, maybe defining a HS backed by something DNS round robined?
 (But the correct thing to do there would be to specify multiple
 VIRTPORT/TARGET pairs with the same VIRTPORT).

 Unless someone chimes in with a use case for FQDNs soon-ish, I'm likewise
 inclined to restrict this to IP addresses (and also deprecate supporting
 the old `inet_aton()` style IPv4 addrs).

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18037#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs