[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #25429 [Circumvention/Snowflake]: Need something better than client's `checkForStaleness`

#25429: Need something better than client's `checkForStaleness`
--------------------------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  arlolra                         |          Owner:  cohosh
     Type:  defect                          |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium                          |      Milestone:
Component:  Circumvention/Snowflake         |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                          |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  anti-censorship-roadmap-2020Q1  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:  #19001                          |         Points:
 Reviewer:                                  |        Sponsor:
                                            |  Sponsor28-must
--------------------------------------------+------------------------------

Comment (by dcf):

 Replying to [comment:21 cohosh]:
 > Ah nice! Thanks. So I guess all there is to do here is decide whether we
 want to shorten this 30 second timeout to say 15 seconds or leave it. I
 don't think it matters too much.

 Agreed, I don't think it matters too much. My intuition says it's good to
 allow for at least one dropped or delayed keepalive ping before dropping a
 proxy.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25429#comment:22>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs