[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-bugs] #1912 [- Select a component]: Choosing bridges by bw is problematic
#1912: Choosing bridges by bw is problematic
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: Sebastian | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: - Select a component | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
We currently choose bridges by bw according to their advertised bw
capacity. This leads to fun bugs, for example: Use just one bridge with
capacity 0, bug #1805 is triggered but things work. Add another (working)
bridge to the set with a capacity != 0: We never choose the bridge with
capacity 0. Make the bridge with capacity != 0 nonworking: The Tor client
breaks, because it wants to use the bridge with capacity. It doesn't try
the other bridge, because it has a weight of 0.
This means two things: new bridges don't get usage as quickly as they
could, because people won't choose them after starting up, and that one of
two in-theory working bridges gets blocked, we might not try the one that
is still good.
One obvious solution would be to just not weight bridges. I think that's
probably the sanest choice for situations where some of your bridges will
frequently be blocked, and others might not be - we don't really want to
keep picking the non-working bridge more than we need to. Not sure if that
has other unwanted side-effects though.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1912>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs