[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-bugs] #31642 [Core Tor/Tor]: Should trunnel_abort() be tor_abort_() or tor_raw_abort_() ?

#31642: Should trunnel_abort() be tor_abort_() or tor_raw_abort_() ?
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
     Reporter:  teor     |      Owner:  (none)
         Type:  defect   |     Status:  new
     Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.4.2.x-final
    Component:  Core     |    Version:
  Tor/Tor                |   Keywords:  BugSmash, diagnostics, 042-should,
     Severity:  Normal   |  android, macos, 035-backport, 040-backport,
                         |  041-backport
Actual Points:           |  Parent ID:  #31594
       Points:           |   Reviewer:
      Sponsor:           |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Another question for you, nickm:

 Should trunnel_abort() be tor_abort_() or tor_raw_abort_() ?

 If so, how can I define trunnel_abort() before including trunnel-impl.h ?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/31642>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs