Re: [tor-bugs] #31642 [Core Tor/Tor]: Should trunnel_abort() be tor_abort_() or tor_raw_abort_() ?

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#31642: Should trunnel_abort() be tor_abort_() or tor_raw_abort_() ?
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  teor                                 |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect                               |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium                               |      Milestone:  Tor:
                                                 |  0.4.2.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor                         |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                               |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  BugSmash, diagnostics, 042-should,   |  Actual Points:
  android, macos, 035-backport, 040-backport,    |
  041-backport                                   |
Parent ID:  #31594                               |         Points:
 Reviewer:                                       |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by nickm):

 Replying to [ticket:31642 teor]:
 > Another question for you, nickm:
 >
 > Should trunnel_abort() be tor_abort_() or tor_raw_abort_() ?

 The higher-level one -- it should be safe to use anything in lib from
 trunnel.

 > If so, how can I define trunnel_abort() before including trunnel-impl.h
 ?

 If you edit trunnel_local.h, that should work.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/31642#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs