On Domingo, 7 de abril de 2013 21:50:55 Runa A. Sandvik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Noel David Torres Taño > > <envite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Domingo, 7 de abril de 2013 20:42:16 Runa A. Sandvik wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Noel David Torres Taño > >> > >> <envite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Domingo, 7 de abril de 2013 20:07:33 Runa A. Sandvik wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Noel David Torres Taño > >> >> > >> >> <envite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > I would like to have a word about translating the webpages too. > >> >> > >> >> We decided to drop website translations a year and a half ago: > >> >> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/whither-website-translations > >> > > >> > I understand the reasons mentioned there, but maybe a different > >> > approach can be used now that we have paid people for translations > >> > (and support). A tiered > >> > >> > method may help working like this: > >> True, but I worry that we will still run into issues with frequent > >> English updates, less frequent translation updates, and translated > >> content that would need manual edits before being included. > > > > Yes. > > > > If the webpage is setup for translation, we can give it a try, at least > > for spanish only, which is LTR, with myself acting in all three layers. > > I think it's worth a try. If it doesn't work, at least we would not have > > spent the time of lots of people but just one person. > > The website is not setup for translations. The website files are .wml. > Transifex does not support this format, so all files would have to be > converted to .po before being translated on Transifex. Once > translated, the files would have to be converted back to .wml > (sometimes with manual edits to make that process complete without > errors). I understand, but I'm not thinking on using Transifex necessarily. I have worked with Website Meta Language previously on the GnuPG webpages. Obviously (I repeat) it is not for me to decide, just reasoning my POV. Regards er Envite ------------------------- A: Because it breaks the logical flow of discussion. Q: Why is top posting bad?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev