[tor-dev] Orbot+Orchid redesign

[Bruce Leidl <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> This makes me wonder: Would it be helpful to start compiling a big
> list of things which could go wrong with a Tor implementation without
> making it obviously broken? I think a checklist like that might help
> people working on compatible implementations to have some idea what to
> look for once you have something that interoperates. Would you have
> found that useful? Would you find that useful now?

Yes, for sure.

I would have found that very useful because the delta between a working
implementation and a secure implementation is quite large and a
checklist would allow me to go down the list and at least *know* that
I'm missing things. Some of these details may even be underspecified and
there would be no easy way for me to find out about them.

--brl


_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev