[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology

To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:51:04 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:51:17 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WK5d/zXF5Qib4LA+O9AwhTROJzxMUVlKdzMzwNIo9wc=; b=C0JECzW6iUVfvpcLDzMawWDQtqYjdhpuGEYZDrvlUXZL70tBswbSTgEiesPDHJ6o6F yw9f+mQix5yAYdpN9GbETWoyLIr7KnFu2jjNaRvVNhZ34FPJl4gXTaKwb6LWZ9ECizOR jzJUWln+HpjgYg6bAu3/wwdOAejXy26+pXkbBWDxvRZ/azJ3oUjtea1cwLiwH+QRQKEc /0uyinvRXoWwi7DXP6c2+BjVet0kg2Fdd3FFNIJ20+73DDRf+5rkApUODLmi3jSfO2Hj gZIvxVM5MtYlAWi24odlsXQnrI0HwEsd7gRwD7uuaj5Ia9kyLWdkNzlyOjyXK8BggpG6 A8uQ==
In-reply-to: <20150210225658.f58d29f6325f42a38ce6cd39@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C530E0A1-DC86-4635-BF64-7E00966BEC45@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150210225658.f58d29f6325f42a38ce6cd39@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo
<mle+tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Several of us [0] working on hidden services have been talking about
>> adopting better terminology.
>
> In general, I am in agreement with this, but I wonder if now might be
> a good time to unify Tor terminology with other similar technologies
> like I2P and Cjdns/Hyperboria.

https://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/Anon_Terminology.shtml
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

References:
- [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology
  - From: A. Johnson
- Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo

Prev by Author: [tor-dev] Research repository [was: Master's Thesis]
Next by Author: [tor-dev] Static compile config and incore runtime [HS via Control Port]
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology
Next by thread: Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread